Moral Volcano is the (now abandoned) web log of V. Subhash. It was started when the HUMOUR section of Virtual V. Subhash (www.vsubhash.com) started overflowing. The name Moral Volcano is from the short story Journalism in Tennessee written by the American writer Mark Twain.
Moral Volcano is not a real volcano; just the name for this website. This site has absolutely no information on morals or volcanoes. You need to improve your search skills. Select this link to find information about real volcanoes. If you were looking for ideas for a class project, then try How To Build a Volcano at About.com. For stories with a moral, visit the site maintained by Srinivas Padmanabhuni. Bye-bye.
MORAL VOLCANO IS UNSAFE FOR CHILDREN AND PREGNANT WOMEN. ADULTS MAY EXPERIENCE DISCOMFORT WHEN READING MORAL VOLCANO. SYMPTOMATIC TREATMENT IS RECOMMENDED.
Any good search engine will bring you here if you type in "moral volcano".
Think George W. is bad? Wait till you read about his father!
Inheritance of Nazi fortunes, financial scandals, coups, assassinations, links to drug trade, and coverups; - all make the former CIA Director and later U.S. Vice President and President George Bush Sr. an unmatchable piece of work.
Buy this book from Amazon.com .
Or, read the free online version at www.tarpley.net
In Jerzy Kosinski's novel Being There, a middle-aged man called Chance Gardener, who has the mental age and development of a six-year-old, goes on to become the President of United States with the help of a few powerful friends while he himself is blissfully unaware of the situation. Peter Sellers chose this novel to make his final film (his masterpiece). Both the novel and the movie were released years before George W. came to the White House. Read my review here.
Gobbledegook! All the time he talked gobbledegook! An' it's for sure a White man's world in America. Hell, I raised that boy since he was the size of a pissant an' I'll say right now he never learned to read an' write - no sir! Had no brains at all, was stuffed with rice puddin' between the ears! Short-changed by the Lord and dumb as a jackass an' look at him now! Yes, sir - all you gotta be is white in America an' you get whatever you want! Just listen to that boy - gobbledegook!
Guess Who Came
|
Head For The Exit!A Nut Has Brought
|
In 1983, Donald Rumsfeld went to Baghdad as Ronald Reagan's special envoy and met Saddam Hussein, despite evidence that Iraq possessed chemical weapons and had used it on civilians in Iraq and on soldiers in Iran. After his return, Rumsfeld successfully lobbied for financial and military aid for Iraq's war with Iran. Chemical and biological intermediaries and labs were provided by the US to Iraq. Other western countries followed suit. Predictably, Saddam used the weapons in the Kurdish north. In one instance, a set of Hughes helicopters provided by Ronald Reagan was used in a chemical attack that left 5000 dead in a Kurdish village called Halabja. Following this, the US Senate passed a Prevention of Genocide Act, which would have imposed sanctions on the Hussein regime but the Reagan White House blocked it.
Between 1983 and 1988, Saddam used chemical weapons 195 times against Iran killing about 50,000 of their soldiers. In 1987, an Iraqi Exocet missile hit an American destroyer, the USS Stark, in the Persian Gulf killing 37 crewmen. Incredibly, the United States excused Iraq for making an unintentional mistake and instead used the incident to accuse Iran of escalating the war in the gulf. The American tilt to Iraq then became more pronounced. U.S. commandos began blowing up Iranian oil platforms and attacking Iranian patrol boats. In 1988, an American warship in the gulf shot down an Iranian Airbus killing 290 civilians. Within a few weeks, Iran, fearing American intervention, gave up its war with Iraq.
George Bush Sr., as Vice President and later as President, used a number of covert and overt schemes to help with Baghdad's WMD programme. Strangely enough, Israel was one of the countries that helped in the transshipment of banned weapons. Saddam was so encouraged by this level of support that he thought he could get away with an invasion Kuwait. Sam Gejdenson, chairperson of a subcommittee in the US Congress investigating US exports to Iraq, disclosed that between 1985 and 1990 the US government approved 771 licenses for the export to Iraq of $1.5 billion worth of biological agents and high-tech equipment used for military applications.
To build the case for the war against Iraq, the Bush administration used the anthrax scare to frighten lawmakers into submission. The US Secretary of State Colin Powell, accompanied by CIA Directory George Tenet, even gave an anthrax demo in the UN Security Council. Interestingly, the anthrax found in Capitol Hill was found to be the same grade as those in the stocks of the US military.
US envoy Bill Richardson with Taliban leaders (circa 1998). See the BBC report for that day.Taliban played host to top US officials including former US assistant secretary of state for South Asia Robin Raphel, her successor Karl Inderfurth, deputy secretary for political affairs Thomas Pickering, and the then-US ambassador to the UN, Bill Richardson. Within hours of Taliban's capture of Kabul, Washington moved quickly to announce that it would establish diplomatic relations with the Taliban government. However, the rash statement was quickly retracted. Afghanistan continued to be officially represented at the UN by the defunct government headed by Banruddin Rabbani and the Taliban greatly resented this. Robin Raphael went to the UN to lobby the international community to ignore the extremist threat posed by the Taliban and recognise the government headed by the group. Contrary to popular belief, Afghanistan has significant oil and gas deposits. During the Soviets' decade-long occupation of Afghanistan, Moscow estimated Afghanistan's proven and probable natural gas reserves at around five trillion cubic feet and production reached 275 million cubic feet per day in the mid-1970s. Nonstop war since has prevent further exploitation, but that soon changes. According to the Houston Chronicle, the country may also have as much copper as Chile, the world's largest producer, and significant deposits of coal, emeralds, tungsten, lead, zinc, uranium ore and more. |
In 1989, the former Soviet Union was forced to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan after fighting a prolonged guerilla war with the Mujahideen. The Mujahideen grew opium, which was then marketed in Europe and North America. Law enforcement agencies in these countries also turned a blind eye to the trafficking business. Proceeds from the trade were then used to buy weapons for the Mujahideen. The Russians left behind a government headed by the former intelligence chief Najibullah. The breakup of the Soviet Union made Najibullah's position weaker and he offered to step down in March 1992. This news triggered a wave of defections by Uzbek and Tajik militias, which were allied to his government. In April 1992, a prominent Mujahideen commander Ahmed Shah Masood (Lion of Panjshir valley) moved into Kabul. Najibullah then took refuge in the UN compound in Kabul. Between 1992 and 1996, Afghanistan was in semi-anarchy, as the country was carved into individual fiefdoms by the warlords.
In 1996, Unocal of the U.S. and Delta Oil of Saudi Arabia became interested in mineral wealth of Central Asian republics of the former Soviet Union. The ideal route to bring oil from the Caspian sea and gas from the Daulatabad gas field (in Turkmenistan) would have been via Iran. Because of US policy of isolating Iran, Unocal and Delta oil thought of building a pipeline via Afghanistan.
Unfortunately for them, Afghanistan did not have a strong regime in place, which could guarantee security for the pipeline. For this purpose, Pakistan created the Taliban with funds from Saudi Arabia and UAE. They took into their rolls thousands of Pasthuns who had enrolled in madrasas adjoining Afghanistan. Because these men had never taken part in war, they were secretly trained and led by officers from the Pakistani army. Arms and ammunition including tanks, howitzers, and other military vehicles were provided Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. In 1996, The Taliban crossed the border into Afghanistan. Initially, they were dismissed as a joke but in September 1996, they had captured Kabul. (Also, see Amnesty International reports on Taleban atrocities.)
However, the Taliban could not occupy all of Afghanistan. (They did occupy 90% of it at one time.) At one point when the Taliban was overstretched and the Northern Alliance was poised to attack, the Clinton administration despatched UN envoy Bill Richardson and Assistant Secretary of State Karl Inderfurth to Afghanistan to broker a ceasefire and an arms embargo. While the Northern Alliance was being bamboozled, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan sent several planeloads of arms and ammunition to Kabul and managed to fully rearm the Taliban. Soon after, the ceasefire failed. This was six months before the US embassies in Africa were attacked and two months after al-Qaeda issued a declaration of jihad to "kill the Americans and their allies - civilian and military."
In 1998, the Al-Qaeda attacked U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Despite this, money continued to flow. Both the Clinton and the Bush administrations gave hundreds of millions of dollars to the Taliban under the guise of aid. As late as July 2001, Christina Rocca, the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia, met Taliban officials in Islamabad and announced $43 million in food and shelter aid, bringing to $124 million the U.S. contribution for that year alone. The U.S. government did not insist on knowing how the money was spent and the flow of dollars did not stop until the attacks on the World Trade Center occurred. It is quite possible that that American taxpayers' money was used to finance the attacks.
To save serious embarassment to the Bush administration, the U.S. media, led by the New York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek and others, has created a notion that the Taliban fought Soviet forces in Afghanistan by tracing its origins to the Mujahideen. The truth however is that the Taliban was not in existence at that time. Taliban was created to fight the Mujahideen, not the Soviets. For more, read CIA and a Blowback World by Tom Engelhardt and Chalmers Johnson.
Interviewer: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?
Brzezinski: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
Interviewer: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?
Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Interviewer: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentlaism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
After Libya revealed that it had sourced components and technology for its clandestine nuclear weapons program from a worldwide network of nuclear arms dealers, Dr. A. Q. Khan, the father of the Islamic nuclear bomb, was named as one of the prime movers in this network. On February 4, 2004, Khan confessed on Pakistan's national television that he had hawked Pakistan's nuclear weapons secrets to other countries and begged forgiveness. With American blessings, Gen. Musharraf wasted no time in granting a pardon for Khan. Gen. Mush also claimed that Mr. Khan acted alone and that no one else was involved in the transfer of the technology, which went to Iran, North Korea and Libya.
No action will be taken on Libya because the Bush administration has shown interest in oil wealth of the country. With the exception of Iraq, Libya is the only OPEC country with spare oil capacity. The two Libyan intelligence officials who were suspects in the Lockerbie bombing are under house arrest and not in prison.
Curiosly, a BBC Scotland news report says that a former Scottish police chief had come forward with the information that the key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated and planted by the CIA. In another bizzare happening, the Amsterdam court that had tried Khan in absentia has claimed that it has "lost" the Khan case files. Before coming back to Pakistan, Khan worked as an engineer in the Netherlands at Urenco, an uranium enrichment plant in the 1970s from where he is suspected of stealing nuclear secrets.
As revealed by former premiers Benazir Bhutto and Nawas Sharif, the Pakistani military establishment including President Musharraf are part of the nuclear trade. North Korea made shipments of missile components to Pakistan in exchange for shipments of wheat from Pakistan. Similarly, China had made shipments of ring magnets and other nuclear eqiupment to Pakistan. But illegal trade in nuclear and missile technology and components is not limited to the Third world. During the Clinton years, US aerospace companies (Loral/Hughes) provided China with technologies that were originally banned for export. The clandestine Israeli nuclear weapons programme was aided by voluntary/involuntary transfer of men, material, and technology from the U.S., Britain, and several other European countries.
The prediction that when Nazism goes to America it will be wrapped in an American flag has become a reality. Nazis believed that if you kept on repeating the same lies again and again, the masses would eventually accept them as truth. Yet again, the Nazis have been proved right. The American people have accepted blatant falsehoods as the truth not because they have been presented with some really great evidence but because they have been repeatedly lied to. And the campaign by faux journalism and the resultant faux news is not limited to the U.S. It is being applied all over the world where phoney revolutions have been staged to put phoney democrats in power. From Lebanon to Ukraine to East Timor, falsehoods have won. The strategy may seem to have failed in Brazil, Venezuela and Bolivia but the setbacks are only temporary. In important countries like Mexico, elections are conducted by private American companies and the electoral rolls are also maintained by them. As there is no paper trail, it is easy to fix the elections.
American diplomats decide who should win elections in Eastern Europe and Third World countries. Western consultants manage everything on the ground - from running opinion/exit polls (so they can claim election fraud) to training volunteers, journalists, and more importantly "pro-democracy protestors" (vital for any regime change that does not involve the U.S. military). Billions of dollars of U.S. government funds are pouring into the coffers of opposition parties and local non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Their mandate is simple - bring down the current dispensation and put pro-Western stooges in power.
Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) such as Freedom House (run by billionaire George Soros) play an important role in all this. If U.S. media claims are to be believed, Soros is a philanthropist who "promotes democracy movements" in Eastern Europe. However, funds for these activities come from the American government - mainly from USAID (United States Aid for International Development). Perusing the USAID Yellowbook for 2001, one will be surprised to note that one of the many Ukraine contracts received by Freedom House is worth almost $2 billion. This is interesting because, among other things, USAID even refuses funds for AIDS treatment in Africa. Reason for this anomaly becomes clear if one reads USAID's mandate - to promote U.S. "stategic interests" worldwide.
Download:
Apart from USAID, a wide range of semi-government and non-governmental institutions are involved to promote U.S. strategic interests - National Democratic Institute (NDI) of the Democratic Party, International Republican Institute (IRI) of the Republican Party, U.S. billionaire George Soros' outfits Open Society and Freedom House. The role of intelligence agencies and diplomatic corps requires no mention. The role of the media is curiousy naieve.
Politicians who have take money are identified as "liberals," while those who have not done so are simply called "hardliners." The result is that artificially created protests are considered by the outside world as spontaneous and indigenous. History then gets replaced by the faux news.
American officials openly ask the U.S. Congress for money to "promote democracy" in other countries. (This happens in between demands for huge budget cuts in social spending for American citizens.) No one in America seems to find it odd that democracy could be promoted with money from a foreign country. What is all the more ironical because it was an American who said democracy is by the people, for the people, and of the people.
During the Cold War, intelligence agencies were entrusted with the task of distributing money. Mark Almond, who describes himself as an old cold war swagman who carried tens of thousands of dollars to Soviet-bloc dissidents alongside much better respected academics, is nostalgic about how things have changed. In an article in Guardian he says:
Back in the 1980s, our media portrayed Prague dissidents as selfless academics who were reduced to poverty for their principles, when they were in fact receiving $600-monthly stipends. Now they sit in the front row of the new Euro-Atlantic ruling class. The dowdy do-gooder who seemed so devoted to making sure that every penny of her "charity" money got to a needy recipient is now a facilitator for investors in our old stamping grounds. The end of history was the birth of consultancy.
In many countries, it is not just the manipulation of elections; civil war is encouraged by exacerbating ethnic or religious divisions. One side is provided with with arms and ammunition and the other side is provoked into causing enormous casualities on civilians. Western government, NGOs and media then allege genocide. UN "peacekeepers" arrive, a referendum on secession is held, and a nation is born. What is not mentioned is that the new country is so weak financially that they can't even afford to open embassies in other countries. West-backed politicians who run the country prefer to listen to foreign investors than to their own people. In the end, "poor people" become more poor and less free. The application of "genocide revolutions" found great success in East Timor and is now being actively pursued in Darfur (Sudan) and several other places.
East Timorese people languish in extreme poverty because their government gets very little in revenue. The government has just one purpose - provide security to Western diplomatic corps and foreign investors (made up of solely oil companies). It has no money either for development or for providing essential services. East Timor, it must be noted, has huge reseverves of gas and oil. It could have easily become a rich country but foriegn oil companies have other plans. Australia has claimed that its maritime border extends for 85% of the 600-mile sea separating the two countries. Under international laws, the border should have been drawn halfway between the two countries, which would have given East Timor 100% of its petroleum resources including the oil-rich Greater Sunrise field. In March 2003, tiny East Timor was forced to cede 79.9 percent of the Greater Sunrise oil and gas field to big nieghbour Australia. The entire worth of the field was an estimated $50 billion.
Also, read
Back when I was in school, there was this program on TV called Race To Save The Planet. Every Sunday, it had this wonderful chick, clad in T-shirt and jeans, sitting on a tree stump with her arms around her knees, talking seriously about future climate change. Climate change? Well, it was supposed to take longer than a lifetime to notice any changes. Only future generations were going to be seriously affected. Unfortunately, climate change seems to have arrived earlier than expected. We have seen some very unprecedented floods induced by torrential floods in various parts of the country and even around the world. (circa 2005) The floods were also preceded by periods of unusually hot weather. My guess is that extreme weather conditions are going to be the norm in future but with increasing severity.
The rise in greenhouses gases in the atmosphere and the consequent rise in global temperatures was expected to cause a slow melting of the ice caps. But, scientists have noted that the area under permafrost around the Arctic circle is fast receding. When peat bogs under the permafrost gets exposed, they start releasing new amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. As this picks up momentum, global temperatures will not just rise but will attempt a high jump.
And, the transition from ice to water occurs over a few degrees. So, the ice cap will not just melt, it will break apart! Large sheets of ice will suddenly break off the North pole and swamp countries in its wake downstream. This ice will break off in such huge proportions that countries near the poles will experience doomsday-size floods that will last for several months. Worse, there will be several floods like that; some of them going on simultaneously. And, that means goodbye to countries like Canada and most of Europe. Large parts of the U.S. and Russia will also dissappear. Antartica will only melt because it is on land and does not float on water like the Arctic. Still, large portions of low-lying land in the southern hemisphere will be eaten away by the sea, leaving hundreds of millions without land under their feet.
Possible Solution: Jaime Pressly |
The treatment that our society gives to rape requires drastic change. Instead of considering rape as a form of physical assault, unnecessary emotional baggage is added to it. In our stupid feature films, if a woman is raped, she has to commit suicide. Or, worse, marry the rapist (if it is the hero guy). But real rape victims cannot commit suicide or marry the rapist! Sadly, our society places a high high value on a woman's character. Feminist propaganda does not help either. The lesbians want death sentence for rapists, making it incumbent on rapists to also kill their victims!
Women's activists portray rape as some kind of unbelievably horrible crime that is simply beyond human nature. Flawless as they are made up to be, women DO commit serious crimes! It has been reported that it is usually a woman who harrases her daughter-in-law for more dowry. Many a woman has handed over the matchbox when her son douses his wife with kerosene. And who do you think snuffs the life out newborn girl children? WOMEN!!!
And, they keep on asking when all women will be safe. It is an incredibly stupid question! Will households ever be safe from burglars? Burglaries will occur just as some marriages will end in divorces. Rapes will occur just as some murders are going to be committed. Deviancy is part of any society. It is an inescapable fact of life, unless of course your marooned on uninhabited island.
What can be done is placing necessary measures to ensure speedy justice; not just for rape but for all crimes. Instead, a fuss is created. Names are published. Photos are printed. In the end, the victim wishes she did not have to survive the trauma. Should not rape victims be able to recover from the incident like from a minor road accident? More than the actual crime itself, it is the way society receives the victim that seems to have a lasting effect.
| Trauma | Victim | Victim's Family |
| Road Accident | gets sympathy | finds social support |
| Sexual Assault | gets a stigma | loses social standing |
Also, read:
Why is the U.S. very much against labelling GM food? In the U.S., we have a policy. If you have a final product that is a substantial equivalent to a conventional product, you need not have to label that it contains GMOs [genetically modified organisms] just because it is a product of GMO; it is a process involved. At the end of the day, it is considered equivalent to the conventional product and so we don't believe in labelling. On the other hand, if you have nutrient enhanced product or a product that contains allergens or toxin, then labelling is required. So we don't believe in process labelling and that is the difference between the U.S. and other countries.Same day as this interview was published in The Hindu, the newspaper's supplement Metro Plus carried the following information in Health Capsules (a syndicated American newspaper cartoon feature):
How do I know if my fish or shellfish is wild, not farm-raised? Beginning in April 2005, all retail fish and shellfish [in the U.S.] were required to be labelled farm-raised or wild-caught and with their country of origin.
A kid who hates freedom. |
"I am not even interested," said Charlie Chaplin when asked whether he was going to have his latest film shown in the U.S. Why, what was wrong? "There is nothing wrong with the American people. It is the top who decay and putrify!," Chaplin explained. Harsh words, no doubt but why? The movie A King In New York was set in New York and yet here was Chaplin (in London, circa 1956) refusing to release the movie in the United States. What made him feel so disgusted and angry? Welcome to the the land of the free.
What many people see of America is not really America; it is Hollywood. Not just foreigners, even Americans see America through the eyes of Hollywood. Take World War II. Many Americans think that it was they who saved the world! (It was actually Russia, led by like-it-or-not Stalin, which was the first to inflict a defeat on the Nazis, free a host of countries from occupation, enter Berlin and take charge of Hitler's bunker.)
Not many know that not until the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour, America had never entered the War on the side of Britain and France. Or, more correctly, they have absolutely no idea of the significance of this decision. Like the grandfather of George Bush, America was busy trading with Nazi Germany. Many, like Bush family patron William Farris (of Standard Oil, now Exxon), were making their fortunes off Nazi slave labour. The U.S. had also closed its gates to European Jews wanting to flee persecution; (forcing them to go to Palestine where they established Israel and have since remained in conflict with the original owners of the land and with their Arab neighbours.) Franklin Roosevelt spent much of his time assuring his nation that he would NEVER send "their children in harm's way" - certainly a poor foil alongside real heroes like Winston Churchill, Charles de Gaulle or even Josef Stalin. It was precisely this geographic and political isolation from the conflict, which drew people in the war zone like a magnet to the American continent.
"DO YOU WANT TO DENY YOURSELF THE RIGHT TO BE A MAN?" reads this psy-ops leaflet, dropped by Americans in Vietnam. You don't see RAMBO dropping leaflets like these! He he he! |
So, after sheep-faced Americans joined the war, films like Casablanca were released, which had Americans showing hitherto unseen courage and sparing no effort to save hapless Europeans from evil Nazis. Sure, these films helped sell a lot of "war bonds" to aid the war effort but "war films" continued to be made even after the real war was over - all of them showing Americans as the selfless saviours of the world; all of them conveniently ignoring the enormous sacrifices made by the Russians and the heavy losses made to bear on civilians in the Axis nations. During the War, American soldiers like good soldiers everywhere went about raping and pillaging when they were not busy fighting. In almost all of the war films, Americans GIs were models of good behaviour. It is this image that generations of Americans have believed in, rather than in what history books would have had to offer.
In his book Know Thine Enemy, Reuel Marc Gerecht, a former CIA man who worked in the US consulate in Istanbul during the 1980s, provides an insight into how Freedom™ typically operates. Gerecht's job was to debrief would-be Iranian defectors:
"I'd let hundreds of desperate Iranians languish in Turkey. People who'd given me insights never found in books. I'd watched mothers with children drop to their knees and beg for my help... They didn't want money, just a little kindness, a visa out of their personal hell ... [they met] a sympathetic man waiting in a warm room full of food, coffee, tea, alcohol and cigarettes. A US official who'd politely strip them of all their memories and every corpuscle of information and then reopen the street-side door."
Rambo II, starring Sylvester Stallone, has Islamic fighters in Afghanistan portrayed as brave freedom fighters, quite in line with government policy at that time. By the time True Lies starring Arnold Schwarznegger was made, the "freedom fighters" had become "terrorists" both on screen and in the real world! Movies that romanticises military life (aiding recruitment, usually from poorer sections of the American society) such as Top Gun or Black Hawk Down get active cooperation (and under-publicised editorial input) from the U.S. military while others that question military postures have to rope in a foreign government for using their military hardware.
AVERAGE VOTER IN A DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY IS A MORON! |
In May 2003, an Iraqi boy who suffered burns all over his body, had his arms amputed above the elbow, and lost 20 members of his family after an American missile hit his home became subject of a media frenzy. Although the boy refused American offers of free medical treatment, Hollywoood went ahead and made a movie starring George Clooney with an expectedly different story ending. In the Balkans, American soldiers have been indicted of raping women and forcing them into prostitution but that did not stop Hollywood from making a movie, which showed the opposite - an American soldier killing another soldier to prevent a rape from happening! George Bush and 9/11 was also subject of a movie. However, it featured no pet goat. In sharp contrast, Micheal Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, which attempted to come to terms with truth, was received with unrepressed hostility.
With every war, the deception continues to grow. Even though the fall of the Saddam statue in the middle of Baghdad or the rapturous welcome given to Ahmed Chalabi on his return to Iraq or the daring rescue of Private Jessica Lynch are considered as classics among military psy-ops films, Hollywood remains unbeaten in their effort at perpetuating myths for the U.S. government.
FAKE NEWS = FREEDOM NEWS? |
Sure, Hollywood has no designs on the world and they are in it with the American war machine only because it is a mutually rewarding relationship. However, truth becomes a casualty - not just in war but also in peace. This blackout is made complete by sanitised coverage of world events by the American media.
In Iraq, for example, news reports are solely based on the version provided by the U.S. military spokesman. American journalists rarely leave the safe confines of the fortified "Green Zone" in Central Baghdad. However, to fool the American public, videos shot by Iraqi journalists are placed in the background. The American journalist wears a bullet-proof vest, stands in front of the camera and then files his "report." A white screen (not seen by viewers) placed behind this brave journalist allows video technicians in a New York or Washington D.C. studio to be able to seamlessly mix the two videos, creating the illusion of the journalist having actually visited the scene. With this kind of deception, the American military remains free to drop bombs on houses of innocent people.
Several decades ago, Jawaharlal Nehru remarked,
"They shoot and kill and destroy only for the good of the people shot down. The novel feature of the modern type of imperialism is its attempt to hide its terrorism and exploitation behind pious phrases."
His words remain true to this very day. And, "they" continue to do it with the approval of the American people. Yet, when a 911 happens, you will hear Americans asking, "Why do they hate us so much?"
THIS IS NOT A JOKE. There were actually two pages on the CIA website under the title Iraqi Rewards Program offering rewards for information regarding Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). One web page was in English (at http://www.cia.gov/cia/english_rewards.htm) and the other was in Arabic (at http://www.cia.gov/cia/arabic_rewards.htm, still present.) The CIA removed the English version after a short time. I had saved a copy of the English version, I put it up here and later moved it to www.vsubhash.com. I also added a timeline of the Iraqi Rewards Program.
In case you are wondering, rest assured that the cia.gov domain is used only to host their website. The domain ucia.gov (unclassified CIA) is used for other unclassified purposes. You can see their updates page for references to ucia.gov.
Want a cool HTML email signature template for use in Outlook express? Then, visit my E-Mail Signature & Template Generator. Echelon Salt™ is purely optional. E-Mail Signature & Template Generator can be customized to include only those details you would like to have in your e-mail signature.
 |
"Echelon Salt®™ is 100% compatible with our Echelon program." |
 |
 |
"Thanks to Echelon Salt®™, at least someone in the government reads our reports now." |
|
 |
"I used Echelon Salt Enterprise Edition®™ for Al-qaida and we got a lot of attention. Unfortunately, our license was stolen and given to someone in the Pentagon basement - to a guy called Abu Musab Al Zarqawi. Soon, all action shifted to Iraq." |
There was a Dennis, The Menace cartoon several years ago, which featured his mother sobbing in front of the TV. In the background, you see Dennis telling his friend that he doesn't know why his mother did not like those watch-and-cry movies.
The Charlie Chaplin classic The Great Dictator is an enormously funny movie but is definitely watch-and-cry in places, particularly where Jews are portrayed in a sympathetic manner. True, this was the original intention but one expects a great master like Chaplin not to bend facts. Here are a few things that stand out as odd.†
The most outrageous thing about film is that the Jewish Barber (Charlie Chaplin) is a soldier. Jews send others to war but rarely become soldiers themselves, a fault railed more than once by Hitler in his Mein Kampf. The barber has just one customer a day. They live in the ghetto and so one can forgive that. Contrary to conventional wisdom about thriftiness of Jews, his friend Hannah (Paulette Goddard) says that it is hard to save money. Belying Jewish involvement in political intrigue, the Jewish group excuses itself from a plot to assassinate the dictator Adenoid Hynkel.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Goebbels is called Garbage (Garbitsch). | Goerring is called Herring. | But, the Jewish Barber remains nameless. | As a good villain, Hitler is perverted. | Jewish love affairs are however less steamy. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Jews have no head for business. | Money slips through their hands "like that". | They want no part in any conspiracy. | James Bond probably is not a Jew.* | But, German villains are still perverted.* |
Of course, Jews who lived in Nazi Germany had a tough time keeping life and body together. However, the portrayal of Jews as an altruistic peace-loving community is misleading nevertheless. The millions of Jews who died because of Hitler were not guilty of any crime. But, there were others in the world of finance, politics, royalty, religion, and press who were. In this film, the former's innocence is used to exonerate the latter.
Also, Chaplin should have showed more tact in making the film. In the Address to Sons and Daughters of the Double Cross scene, Chaplin insults Bismark while addressing Herring. If Chaplin had a better sense of history, he would have realised that Jews were perceived as enemies of German nationalism. Jews were also seen as collaborators or sponsors of interests inimical to Germany. Strangely, the conspiracy scene with the plates of puddings looks eerily similar to The Last Supper.
Anyway, the idea of having a ballroom above the glass ceiling of the saloon is indeed very clever. I wonder if it was Hitler's idea or Chaplin's. And that brings my attention to the practice of using sexual perversion to degrade the integrity of villains. This seems to be a pattern. Several years ago, I saw a movie where German folk music and dance was shown in poor light when compared to the implied superiority of the instrumental symphony performed by a Jewish orchestra. Even recently, Matt LeBlanc (Joey of Friends sitcom) was in a movie in which he disguises as a woman and administers a Nazi general some sadomasochistic action. Hollywood need to do some introspection on this account. The Abu Ghraib scandal has proved beyond any doubt that creativity in sexual perversion was not a Nazi monopoly.
* - The stills are from the movie Tomorrow Never Dies.
† - The film ends with a speech by the Hynkel character asking men to listen to their hearts and act sensibly. I think that was the whole point of the movie. To see the full transcript of that speech, click here.
Link to Moral Volcano's The Great Dictator: 'The Glass Is Half-Empty' Review
Your Comment
The sandalwood smuggler Veerappan is dead. He was killed by the Special Task Force (STF) yesterday night in a shootout in Dharmapuri district of Tamil Nadu. The Karnataka CM was all over the news channels. Interestingly, Karnataka police had been operating in the STF without any political support from their government.
Veerappan would not met his fate had it not been for the tireless efforts of Chief Minister J. Jayalalitha. During her earlier stint as CM, she got the police departments of the Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Kerala go after Veerappan. She even got the help of Border Security Force (BSF). The task force headed by Walter Dawaram wiped out most of his gang, including his brother Arjunan. By 1996, the numerical strength of the Veerappan gang was reduced to less than 10 from a high of over 100. Veerappan's capture at that time seemed imminent but the defeat of Jayalalitha in the state election prevented it.
When M. Karunanidhi of the DMK became the TN CM after the elections, he prevented the STF from conducting operations against Veerappan. The police was barred from even intelligence gathering. Curiously, around this time, The Hindu published a few articles of a DMK MLA was in sandalwood smuggling and about his interference with the Forest Department. Instead of putting the facts to the public, Karunanidhi complained to the press that the editor† of the newspaper did not come respond to his phone calls. After some time, however, The Hindu stopped pursuing the story.* Meanwhile, RR Gopal (editor of the Nakeeran scandal sheet) and the Sun TV‡ channel began hyping the Veerappan legend to the stratosphere. Veerappan during this time had allied with terrorist groups such as the Tamil Nadu Liberation Army (TNLA) and the Sri Lankan LTTE. He also started receiving huge sums of money as ransom¤ while the state police was asked to look the other way.
Things changed in 2001, when Jayalalitha strode back to power. She put the STF back again on the trail of Veerappan. Veerappan again was on the run. But, in Karnataka, Congress was in power and they did not cooperate with the TN police. It was because of the individual efforts of Karnataka policemen that Veerappan's movements in that state was checked.
Unlike Karunanidhi, Jayalalitha has been a true patriot when it comes to India's security. When Muslim terrorists were creating trouble in Coimbatore, Jayalalitha put the police on the job of watching their activities. When Karunanidhi came to power, he took the police off Al-Umma and the Jihad Committe. As a result, they planted several bomb in public places that killed scores of people.
Similarly, with regard to LTTE, Jayalalitha had always acted in the national interest while Karunanidhi acted the other way. Even after LTTE turned against the India, Karunanidhi continued to help them. Every major town in Tamil Nadu had safe houses for LTTE cadres. Fuel, medicines, and other supplies worth hundreds of crores of rupees were smuggled from Tamil Nadu to Sri Lanka. The police were told to keep off. Even when they tried, they were only armed with Lee Enfield .303 rifles while the LTTE were armed with modern assault rifles and grenades. Emboldened by all this, the LTTE successfully liquidated the EPRLF leader K. Padmanabha in Madras. Later, using a suicide squad, they assasinated Rajiv Gandhi in Sriperumbudur.
* - Later, a forest ranger Vijayan died "under mysterious circumstances" within hours of giving astatement to the CBI in a sandalwood smuggling case against a DMK MLA. Mr. Vijayan was a witness in the case. The CB-CID claimed that he had died in a road accident.
† - N. Ram, the editor of The Hindu recently claimed that the STF were a waste of money and recommended that its operations be wound up.
‡ - Predictably, Sun TV's coverage of the incident had no mention of Jayalalitha. They also failed to mention that the Karunanidhi government had demobilised the STF during its tenure. They also referred to the STF as Rapid Action Force. The RAF is with the Central Government.
¤ - In the preface of his book Veerappan's Prize Catch: Rajkumar, C. Dinakar (a former director general of police of Karnataka) claims that a huge ransom was paid to the bandit - Only a handful of people know what really happened. I am the only one among them who is free to write this book.
Link to Moral Volcano's Veerappan Is Dead! Long Live Jayalalithaa!
Your Comment
BBC+hardtalk+jayalalitha, "bbc news" jayalalitha september 2004, hardtalk+jayalalitha, ,
jayalalithaa interview "BBC", jayalalitha bbc hardtalk: There has been unbelievable amount of search requests for the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa's interview with Karan Thapar on the BBC HARDtalk programme.
I don't know why sane people let themselves be interviewed by this silly guy. He is probably the most irritating fellow on television (i.e. if you don't consider tele-evangelists). He repeatedly interrupts the interviewee. He also attempts to put words in their mouth, which distracts them. Just before the parliamentary elections, Seema Mustafa of The Asian Age published a set of articles on the Bofors affair. Karan Thapar asked her if she felt sorry for having returns the articles. This was exactly the opposite of how she felt. She got an exclusive when the Swedish inspector wanted to talk to someone in the Indian media and she was very clearly elated about it. After the elections, when the Congress was finding it difficult to get parties rally around Sonia Gandhi, Karan Thapar did a Lyse Doucet, interviewing several party leaders and repeatedly asking them if they would support a government under Sonia Gandhi. Even when they said no, he would add some qualifiers and then repeat the same question. It was very pathetic because it seemed as though Congress had hired him to help in the coalition-building process. This interview with Jayalalitha seems to have been no different. You can find the full transcript at BBC.co.uk. The interview ended with:
Karan Thapar: Chief Minister, a pleasure talking to you on HARDtalk India.
Jayalalithaa: I must say it wasn’t a pleasure talking to you. Namaste.
While updating an earlier post about hacking with Google's filetype: search, I found an émail file on Harward University's server, which contained the following:
Don't Believe Everything They Say
From the Google Cache of Harvard University Server
Importance of water, are you drinking enough? We all know that water is important but I've never seen it written down like this before.
- 75% of Americans are chronically dehydrated.
- In 37% of Americans, the thirst mechanism is so weak that it is often mistaken for hunger.
- Even MILD dehydration will slow down one's metabolism as much as 3%.
- One glass of water shuts down midnight hunger pangs for almost 100% of the dieters studied in a U-Washington study.
- Lack of water is the #1 trigger of daytime fatigue.
- Preliminary research indicates that 8-10 glasses of water a day could significantly ease back and joint pain for up to 80% of sufferers.
- A mere 2% drop in body water can trigger fuzzy short-term memory, trouble with basic math, and difficulty focusing on the computer screen or Drinking 5 glasses of water daily decreases the risk of colon cancer by 45%, plus it can slash the risk of breast cancer by 79%, and one is 50% less likely to develop bladder cancer.
- Are you drinking the amount of water you should every day?
No kidding, all of the above is true. Of course, too much water may have strange side effects
(see picture below) [click and see above. WARNING: May be injurious to your eyes!]
Here is another one.
American liquor manufacturers have accepted the FDA's suggestion that the following warning labels be placed immediately on all varieties of alcohol beverage containers:
- WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may leave you wondering what the hell happened to your bra and panties.
- WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may make you think you are whispering when you are not.
- WARNING: The consumption of alcohol is a major factor in dancing like a retard.
- WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may cause you to tell your friends over and over again that you love them.
- WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may cause you to think you can sing.
- WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may lead you to believe that ex-lovers are really dying for you to telephone them at four in the morning.
- WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may make you think you can logically converse with members of the opposite sex without spitting.
- WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may create the illusion that you are tougher, smarter, faster and better looking than most people.
- WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may lead you to think people are laughing WITH you.
- WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may cause pregnancy.
- WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may be a major factor in getting your a** kicked.
- WARNING: the crumsumpten of alcohol may Mack you tink you kan tpye reel gode
* - The whole truth about the affair will be revealed if deal is scrapped. The Indian government can do this because the contract was signed on the condition that no middlemen would be involved and no commisions would be paid. It has been proved before courts in Sweden and Switzerland that Bofors had indeed engaged middlemen and paid commisions to a number of individuals. Now, the government can scrap the deal and for the money to be repaid. Another important thing to note is that even though the Bofors case is called the 64-crore case, it only covers only a part of the commision that was paid. The total amount of commisions runs into hundreds of crores. The 64-crore figure was arrived at to limit the investigation team's purview.
† - Originally, the army was in favour of the French Snecma gun but overriding its objections, the Swedish Bofors howitzers were selected. The then Army Chief K. Sundarji also reframed the gun requirements so that the Bofors gun would be the winner. K. Sundarji was a student of General Staff College at Fort Levenworth in the United States. He probably went under American influence when he was stationed in Congo as part of the UN peacekeeping force. Thanks to him, Congo remains a client state of the U.S. even to his day. Sundarji was also responsible for the failure of Operation Bluestar and the IPKF mission in Sri Lanka. In his later years, he wrote a book called Blind Men of Hindoostan. In the book, he suggests that the state of Jammu & Kashmir be jointly run by India and Pakistan. He also suggested that India and all other nuclear powers place their nuclear arsenal with UN; to be used in case of an attack by martians or creatures from outer space.
‡ - Madhavsinh Solanki (External Affairs Minister in the Narasmiha Rao government) had to resign after it was revealed that he had personally handed over a letter to Swedish prosecutor asking the Swedish government to go slow on the investigation. All the important signatures were put on the files in a single day and the deal was thus passed with amazing speed. This would not have happened had there not been a determined meeting of minds. After Rajiv Gandhi died, the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation was formed with donations from several unknown individuals living abroad. The foundation was also given a legitimate cover by government funds brought in by the Narasimha Rao government. Initially, there were government officials on the board of the foundation to see how the funds were spent. But, the Minister for Human Resources Development Madhavrao Scindia removed them and gave full control to Sonia Gandhi.
Link to Moral Volcano's Strange Search Requests - IX
Your Comment
Although the statement "Lies, not love, makes the world go round," was made in the context of human relationships (in the article Bombay Sucks), it symbolises everything that Moral Volcano has been saying. To paraphrase Michael Moore, we live in fictitious times. Lies rule the world.
CafePress says: Panty-minimalists love our casual thong that covers sweet spots without covering your assets, putting an end to panty-lines. This under-goodie is "outta sight" in low-rise pants. Toss these message panties onstage at your favorite rock star or share a surprise message with someone special ... later.
* - Conditions Apply
Moral Volcano is written by V. Subhash, a former writer for British magazine The Current Bun, where he was noted for his interest in modified sweat glands, which not being the focus of his employer was contributory to his firing. Currently, the author lives with his wife, children and mistress in Virginia, U.S., where he is an active campaigner for the American Nazi party better known by its official name Republican.
Rating Scale |
Votes |
|
|
BAD - |
|
POOR - |
|
FAIR - |
|
GOOD - |
|
EXCELLENT - |
|
|
To vote, just click on one of the panels on the Rating Scale. Your vote will be instantly accepted. The voting started on 3 October 2005. |
|
|
Visitors:
|
|
